Indian Forest Service (Mains), Chemistry optional · 2023 · Paper II
Q1(f). Why nucleophilic shifts are common
Question
Why are nucleophilic 1,2 shifts more common than electrophilic or free-radical 1,2 shifts?
Answer in brief
An adjacent electron-deficient centre can accept a migrating sigma-bond pair through a favourable three-centre interaction.
Key points
- In a nucleophilic shift the migrating group carries the bonding electron pair; an empty p orbital on the adjacent carbocation provides an accessible acceptor.
- The shift can replace a less stable cation by a more stable one or relieve ring strain. Correct orbital alignment is still required.
- An electrophilic shift towards a carbanion would require migration without the bonding pair; many ordinary alkyl frameworks lack a favourable low-energy pathway.
- Radical shifts involve three-electron bonding and are commonly less favourable than fragmentation or hydrogen transfer; the trend is not an absolute prohibition.
The full model answer
As written for the answer booklet: the diagram carries the working, the lines stay short. Read here only; it is not offered as a download.

Topic notes: molecular rearrangements, with every Civil Services, IFoS and Geo-Scientist PYQ →
Covers1,2-shiftWagner–Meerwein rearrangementcarbocation rearrangementradical rearrangementcarbanion rearrangement
All parts of Question 1
- 1(a) Aromaticity of heterocycles5 marks
- 1(b) Evidence for a tetrahedral intermediate5 marks
- 1(c) Benzyne capture by tetracyclone5 marks
- 1(d) Para-alkyl effects on benzyl solvolysis5 marks
- 1(e) Dehydrobromination through an ion pair5 marks
- 1(f) Why nucleophilic shifts are common5 marks
- 1(g) A double oxy-Cope rearrangement5 marks
- 1(h) Substituent effects in Cannizzaro reaction5 marks