2.11 Molecular Orbital Theory: LCAO, Homonuclear and Heteronuclear Diatomics (O₂, N₂, CO, NO, CN⁻, HF), Bond Order and Magnetism
★★★ 2021–2025: 9 Mains parts, 100 marks (Civil Services 4 parts / 50 m · IFoS 5 / 50 m), including a 20-mark NO question in 2025. Almost every part asks you to draw an MO diagram and read off bond order and magnetism: learn to draw four diagrams (N₂, O₂, CO, NO) cleanly and the rest is arithmetic.
Syllabus lines. Civil Services: “Molecular orbital theory (LCAO method); bonding in H₂⁺, H₂, He₂⁺ to Ne₂, NO, CO, HF, and CN⁻; comparison of valence bond and molecular orbital theories, bond order, bond strength and bond length.” IFoS: “Molecular orbital theory (LCAO method); bonding in homo- and heteronuclear diatomic molecules … bond order, bond strength and bond length.”
Download PDF PLAN
CSE 2024 Q7(a) = asked there; tap to open the solved answerSN = line kept in the short notes
2.11.1 LCAO: bonding and antibonding orbitals ★★★
- A molecular orbital is a linear combination of atomic orbitals. In-phase addition piles up electron density between the nuclei: bonding, lower energy. Out-of-phase gives a nodal plane between the nuclei: antibonding (*), higher energy. α = Coulomb integral (energy of the AO), β = resonance integral (negative), S = overlap.SN
- Because of the 1 ± S denominators, the antibonding MO is raised more than the bonding MO is lowered: He₂ (2 bonding + 2 antibonding electrons) is unbound. Number of MOs formed = number of AOs used.SN
- Three conditions for two AOs to combine: (i) similar energy, (ii) good overlap, (iii) same symmetry about the bond axis (σ with σ, π with π). If the symmetry differs, + overlap on one side cancels − overlap on the other: S = 0 at every distance, and the orbital stays non-bonding.SN
Solved PYQ CSE 2022 Q1(b) 10m: atom A offers 2s, 2px; atom B offers 2py, 2pz (z = bond axis). Which interactions are non-bonding?
- 2s(A)–2pz(B): both symmetric about the axis (σ): net overlap, bonding/antibonding pair.
- 2s(A)–2py(B): the s lobe meets the + and − halves of py equally: S = 0, non-bonding. 2px(A)–2pz(B): the same cancellation with roles exchanged: non-bonding.SN
- 2px(A)–2py(B): both π type but in perpendicular planes; the product is + in two quadrants and − in two: S = 0, non-bonding. The cancellation comes from symmetry, so it holds at every A–B distance.SN
2.11.2 Homonuclear diatomics and s–p mixing ★★★
- s–p mixing: σg2s and σg2p have the same symmetry, so they interact when the 2s–2p gap is small (B, C, N: gap 5.8–12.4 eV). σg2s is pushed down and σg2p pushed above πu2p. In O and F the gap is large (16.5, 21.5 eV): little mixing, σg2p stays below πu2p (Fig. 2.11.2). Photoelectron spectra confirm both orders.SN
- Each π level is doubly degenerate; Hund’s rule fills them singly first, which is why B₂ and O₂ are paramagnetic.SN
| Molecule | Valence e | Configuration (beyond σ2s² σ*2s²) | BO | Unpaired e | r / pm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B₂ | 6 | π2p² | 1 | 2 (para) | 159.0 |
| C₂ | 8 | π2p⁴ | 2 | 0 | 124.2 |
| N₂ | 10 | π2p⁴ σ2p² | 3 | 0 | 109.8 |
| O₂ | 12 | σ2p² π2p⁴ π*2p² | 2 | 2 (para) | 120.8 |
| F₂ | 14 | σ2p² π2p⁴ π*2p⁴ | 1 | 0 | 141.2 |
| Ne₂ | 16 | … σ*2p² | 0 | 0 | not bound |
Bond lengths: Miessler–Tarr Table 5.1. The higher the bond order, the shorter and stronger the bond.
Solved PYQ IFoS 2025 Q2(c)(ii) 5m: “B₂ has a bond order of one and is paramagnetic.” Substantiate.
- B₂ has 6 valence electrons. For B, C, N, s–p mixing puts πu2p below σg2p, so the configuration is σ2s² σ*2s² π2px¹ π2py¹.SN
- BO = ½(4 − 2) = 1; the two π electrons sit singly in degenerate orbitals with parallel spins (Hund): paramagnetic. Without mixing, σ2p² would give a diamagnetic B₂, which experiment rules out: the magnetism itself proves s–p mixing.SN
2.11.3 The O₂ family: bond order, length, energy, magnetism ★★★
| Species | Valence e | π*2p electrons | Bond order | r(O–O) / pm | D / kJ mol⁻¹ | Magnetism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O₂⁺ (dioxygenyl) | 11 | 1 | 2.5 | 111.6 | 642 | para, 1 unpaired |
| O₂ | 12 | 2 | 2 | 120.8 | 494 | para, 2 unpaired |
| O₂⁻ (superoxide) | 13 | 3 | 1.5 | 135 | 394 | para, 1 unpaired |
| O₂²⁻ (peroxide) | 14 | 4 | 1 | 150.4 | 210 | dia |
r from Miessler–Tarr Table 5.1; D as given in IFoS 2025 Q2(b)(ii).
- Each electron added to π*2p lowers the bond order by ½; each removed raises it by ½. Bond order ↑ ⇒ bond length ↓, dissociation energy ↑, stretching frequency ↑ CSE 2024 Q2(b)(i) 10m IFoS 2025 Q2(b)(ii) 10m IFoS 2023 Q2(c) 10m.SN
- Stability order: O₂⁺ > O₂ > O₂⁻ > O₂²⁻. Valence-bond theory (O=O, all paired) cannot explain why O₂ is paramagnetic (liquid O₂ hangs between the poles of a magnet); MO theory gets it at once: two unpaired π* electrons, a triplet ground state.SN
Part of VKC Basic
Read all 9 sections of this topic, its short notes and the PDF with VKC Basic
VKC Basic (₹999 for 6 months) opens every solved answer, the notes, the handbook and the daily answer archive. Every Mains test series includes it.
Solved PYQs, short notes and books: vkcscience.comTelegram: t.me/upsc_chemistry_vkc