13.6 Substitution in Complexes: Labile and Inert, Trans Effect, Stability Constants, Chelate Effect
★★★ 2021–2025: 14 parts, 120 marks (Civil Services 2 parts / 20 m · IFoS 1 / 10 m · Geo-Scientist 11 / 90 m). The trans effect (“identify A, B, C”) is asked in Geo-Scientist every year; stability constants and the chelate effect come with numbers.
Syllabus lines. Civil Services and IFoS: “thermodynamic and kinetic stability … reaction mechanisms”; “trans effect”. Geo-Scientist: “Thermodynamic and kinetic aspects of metal complexes; labile and inert complexes; stability constants; chelate effect; substitution reactions in square planar complexes, trans effect”.
Download PDF PLAN
CSE 2024 Q7(a) = asked there; tap to open the solved answerSN = line kept in the short notes
13.6.1 Thermodynamic stability and kinetic inertness ★★★
- Thermodynamic stability is about the equilibrium: how far a complex forms, measured by the formation constant β (or ΔG° = −RT ln β). Kinetic stability is about speed: how fast its ligands are replaced, measured by a rate constant or half-life.SN
- Labile: substitution complete within about 1 min at 25 °C (0.1 M, Taube's working rule); inert: slower. These are kinetic words; “stable” and “unstable” are thermodynamic words Geo 2023 Q1(b) 5m.SN
- The two are independent. [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻ is very stable (log β₄ ≈ 30) yet labile (¹⁴CN⁻ exchanges in seconds). [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ is thermodynamically unstable in acid (K ≈ 10²⁵ for hydrolysis to [Co(H₂O)₆]³⁺) yet survives for days in 6 M HCl: it is inert Geo 2025 Q7(a) 10m.SN
13.6.2 Which complexes are labile? ★★★
- Water-exchange rate constants span 16 powers of ten: [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ ≈ 10⁹ s⁻¹, [Ni(H₂O)₆]²⁺ ≈ 10⁴, [Cr(H₂O)₆]³⁺ ≈ 10⁻⁶, [Ir(H₂O)₆]³⁺ ≈ 10⁻¹⁰. Higher charge, smaller ion and higher LFSE make a complex inert.SN
- VBT (Taube): outer-orbital (sp³d²) complexes are labile; inner-orbital (d²sp³) complexes are labile only if one t₂g orbital is empty (d⁰–d²). So d³ and low-spin d⁴–d⁶ are inert.SN
- CFT: in a dissociative step the octahedron becomes a square pyramid; the loss of LFSE is the crystal-field activation energy (CFAE). Large positive CFAE = inert.SN
| dn (octahedral) | CFAE to square pyramid / Dq | Behaviour | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| d⁰, d¹, d², d¹⁰; high-spin d⁴–d⁷, d⁹ | 0 or negative | labile | [Ti(H₂O)₆]³⁺, [Zn(H₂O)₆]²⁺, [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺ |
| d³ | +2.00 | inert | [Cr(H₂O)₆]³⁺, [Cr(CN)₆]³⁻ |
| low-spin d⁴ · d⁵ · d⁶ | +1.43 · +0.86 · +4.00 | inert (d⁶ most) | [Mn(CN)₆]³⁻, [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻, [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ |
| d⁸ | +2.00 | moderately slow | [Ni(H₂O)₆]²⁺ (10⁴ s⁻¹) |
Solved PYQ Geo 2021 Q4(b)(ii) 5m Geo 2025 Q7(a) 10m
Order the lability of [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻, [Mn(CN)₆]³⁻ and [Cr(CN)₆]³⁻; comment on their thermodynamic and kinetic stability.
- [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻: square-planar d⁸, 16 e, with an empty pz orbital: an incoming ligand adds easily (associative) → labile, though thermodynamically very stable.
- [Mn(CN)₆]³⁻: low-spin d⁴ (t₂g⁴), no empty t₂g, CFAE +1.43 Dq → inert. [Cr(CN)₆]³⁻: d³ (t₂g³), CFAE +2.00 Dq, and higher charge density on Cr³⁺ → more inert.
- Lability: [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻ ≫ [Mn(CN)₆]³⁻ > [Cr(CN)₆]³⁻. All three are thermodynamically stable (CN⁻ is a strong σ donor and π acceptor), so stability does not decide lability.SN
13.6.3 Substitution in octahedral complexes ★★
- Mechanisms (Langford–Gray): D (dissociative, five-coordinate intermediate), A (associative, seven-coordinate intermediate), I (interchange, no intermediate: Id or Ia). Most octahedral substitutions are Id: rate depends on the leaving group much more than on the entering group.SN
- Eigen–Wilkins mechanism: the complex and the entering ligand first form an outer-sphere encounter pair (fast pre-equilibrium KE), then the inner-sphere ligand is lost (rate constant k):
- At low [Y] the reaction looks second order; at high [Y] it saturates at rate = k[complex]. Base hydrolysis of ammine complexes, rate = k[complex][OH⁻], goes by the SN1CB path (OH⁻ removes an N–H proton; the amido conjugate base loses Cl⁻ fast).SN
13.6.4 Substitution in square-planar complexes ★★★
- Square-planar d⁸ complexes (16 e, empty pz) react by an associative path: Y attacks above the plane, a five-coordinate trigonal bipyramid forms with T (the ligand trans to X), X and Y in the trigonal plane, then X leaves. The k₁ term is the same path with solvent as the attacking group.SN
- Evidence: rate depends on Y (nucleophilicity order); large negative ΔS‡ and ΔV‡; the geometry is retained (cis gives cis, trans gives trans) IFoS 2022 Q7(b)(i) 10m.SN
Part of VKC Basic
Read all 11 sections of this topic, its short notes and the PDF with VKC Basic
VKC Basic (₹999 for 6 months) opens every solved answer, the notes, the handbook and the daily answer archive. Every Mains test series includes it.
Solved PYQs, short notes and books: vkcscience.comTelegram: t.me/upsc_chemistry_vkc