Q3(a). trans- and cis-2-Bromocyclopentanol with hydroxide
Formulate the following reactions and propose mechanism:
(i) trans-2-bromocyclopentanol → (OH⁻) Cyclopentene oxide
(ii) cis-2-bromocyclopentanol → (OH⁻) trans-1,2-cyclopentanediol
Answer in brief
(i) The trans-bromohydrin forms an alkoxide anti-periplanar to Br and closes to cyclopentene oxide by intramolecular SN2. (ii) The cis isomer cannot do so; OH⁻ displaces Br with inversion and gives trans-cyclopentane-1,2-diol. Both results show the back-side (anti) requirement of SN2.
Key points
- OH⁻ deprotonates the OH: R-OH + OH⁻ ⇌ R-O⁻ + H₂O.
- In the trans compound the O⁻ on C-1 and Br on C-2 are on opposite faces; in the half-chair (envelope) conformer they are anti-periplanar. The alkoxide attacks C-2 from the back, and Br⁻ leaves (an intramolecular Williamson…
- The three-membered ring closes with inversion at C-2. Because it is intramolecular (high effective concentration), it is much faster than attack by external OH⁻: the product is cyclopentene oxide (6-oxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane), a…
- The alkoxide of the cis isomer is on the same face as Br; it cannot reach the back of C–Br, so no epoxide can form.
The full model answer
Written out in full, as it should go in the answer booklet. The solution page with its diagrams follows it.
Introduction. Hydroxide first removes the O–H proton (fast acid–base step). What the alkoxide can do next depends on the geometry. An intramolecular SN2 needs the O⁻ to reach the back of the C–Br bond, i.e. O and Br anti-periplanar; this is possible only in the trans isomer. In the cis isomer the O⁻ lies on the same face as Br, so the external OH⁻ does the back-side attack instead.
(i) trans isomer: neighbouring-group participation gives the epoxide
Scheme: The alkoxide is a built-in nucleophile on the face opposite to Br.
- OH⁻ deprotonates the OH: R-OH + OH⁻ ⇌ R-O⁻ + H₂O.
- In the trans compound the O⁻ on C-1 and Br on C-2 are on opposite faces; in the half-chair (envelope) conformer they are anti-periplanar. The alkoxide attacks C-2 from the back, and Br⁻ leaves (an intramolecular Williamson ether synthesis, rate ∝ [bromohydrin][OH⁻]).
- The three-membered ring closes with inversion at C-2. Because it is intramolecular (high effective concentration), it is much faster than attack by external OH⁻: the product is cyclopentene oxide (6-oxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane), a cis-fused meso epoxide.
(ii) cis isomer: direct SN2 by hydroxide
Scheme: Attack from the face opposite to Br puts the new OH trans to the old one.
- The alkoxide of the cis isomer is on the same face as Br; it cannot reach the back of C–Br, so no epoxide can form.
- External OH⁻ attacks C-2 from the face opposite to Br (bimolecular SN2, slower). The configuration at C-2 is inverted: the new OH ends up on the face opposite to the C-1 OH.
- The product is trans-cyclopentane-1,2-diol (racemic, R,R + S,S).
Check through the epoxide. The same trans-diol is formed if the epoxide of (i) is opened by OH⁻ (back-side attack on one carbon): epoxide opening and direct SN2 on the cis bromohydrin both deliver anti stereochemistry. Hence (i) at higher temperature and longer time also ends at the trans-diol.
Conclusion. (i) The trans-bromohydrin forms an alkoxide anti-periplanar to Br and closes to cyclopentene oxide by intramolecular SN2. (ii) The cis isomer cannot do so; OH⁻ displaces Br with inversion and gives trans-cyclopentane-1,2-diol. Both results show the back-side (anti) requirement of SN2.
Application. Halohydrin ring closure is the industrial chlorohydrin route to propylene oxide and epichlorohydrin, and the anti-periplanar rule is used to predict which steroid halohydrins give epoxides.
Practising this answer? Write it in a Mains test and get it checked by VKC. Civil Services Mains test series · Telegram

All parts of Question 3
- 3(a) trans- and cis-2-Bromocyclopentanol with hydroxide15 marks
- 3(b) 1,5-Hexadiene from 2-methylpiperidine by two Hofmann eliminations15 marks
- 3(c) Fischer indole synthesis with butan-2-one: two indoles20 marks