UPSC Combined Geo-Scientist, Mains · 2023 · Mains Paper III
Q1(d). Graphite-furnace AAS compared with flame AAS
Question
What is the advantage and disadvantage of GF-AAS as compared to Flame-AAS?
Answer in brief
Advantage: far higher sensitivity (absolute detection limits 100 to 1000 times lower, picograms) from only 10–50 µL of sample. Disadvantage: poorer precision, slow analysis, stronger background and matrix interference.
Key points
- GF-AAS: 10–50 µL of sample is dried, ashed and atomised inside an electrically heated graphite tube in argon.
- Atomisation is nearly 100 % efficient (a flame atomises as little as 0.1 %); absolute detection limits are 100 to 1000 times lower: picograms.
- Very small sample (microlitres); solids, slurries and viscous samples are taken directly.
- Poorer precision: about 5–10 % against about 1 % for the flame; slow, one element at a time.
- Stronger background and matrix effects: background correction (D₂ lamp or Zeeman) and matrix modifiers are needed.
The full model answer
As written for the answer booklet: the diagram carries the working, the lines stay short. Read here only; it is not offered as a download.

Coversgraphite furnace AASelectrothermal atomisationflame AASdetection limitatomic absorption
All parts of Question 1
- 1(a) Relative standard deviation of replicate results5 marks
- 1(b) HPLC against GLC; particle size of packed GLC columns5 marks
- 1(c) Sources of radiation for infrared spectrometry5 marks
- 1(d) Graphite-furnace AAS compared with flame AAS5 marks
- 1(e) Calibration of the temperature axis in thermogravimetry5 marks
- 1(f) K and L lines in XRF; wavelength-dispersive spectrum of Zn5 marks
- 1(g) Interference of calcium in the ICP–MS determination of iron5 marks
- 1(h) Type metal: constituents and non-destructive analysis5 marks